|
OUR
MISSION
Competitive
bodybuilding is everchanging.
From its inception (at least the modern one accepted by most bodybuilding
historians) 100 years ago until the present it has evolved as no
other professional sport. While it's not hard to imagine a time-transported
Ty Cobb or Babe Ruth being able to get at least a few hits off of
Roger Clemens, there is no doubt that Eugen Sandow (recognized by
many to be the father of bodybuilding) would look quite out of place
on even a local-level bodybuilding contest stage. In fact, professional
champions from only two decades ago would never be able to even
qualify for the 2002 Mr. Olympia, much less compete in it.
Just look
at the facts: When Chris Dickerson won the 1982 Mr. Olympia he weighed
well on the shy side of 200 lbs. at a height of 5' 7". Ronnie
Coleman, the reigning four time Mr. Olympia stands 5'11" and
competes in the 260-265 lb. neighborhood with even less bodyfat
than Dickerson sported.
 |
|
Virtual
Posedown: Dickerson vs. Coleman
|
The amount
of bodymass seen on some of today's pro, and even amateur, competitors
would have been considered unattainable back when our current President's
dad sat in the White House.
So, looking
at raw stats an easy assumption could be made that because bodybuilders
are getting bigger and leaner they are getting better. Not necessarily.
I discovered
bodybuilding at around the age of 12. It happened while I was in
the book section of a now-defunct department store.
While waiting
for one parent or another to finish their shopping I started thumbing
through the display copies of various books. None had really kept
my attention until I discovered a large format softcover featuring
a man of massive proportions holding his arms aloft against a black
background. It was titled "Pumping Iron: The Art and Sport
of Bodybuilding."
It's funny
to me when I consider the consequences of that chance find today,
24 years later. Because here I am, still preaching, practicing,
writing about, and thinking about the art and sport Charles Gaines
and George Butler described so vividly in their now-classic homage.
And what
they wrote about and photographed was a group of men who took it
upon themselves to transform their bodies into what they wanted
them to be. All of the men profiled in "Pumping Iron"
made the decision that they no longer wanted to look "average."
They wanted more from their bodies. So they used barbells, dumbbells,
pulleys and the like to sculpt magnificent, uber-physiques out of
mere flesh. They looked to me, at the time, not at all unlike the
super heroes on the pages of the comic books I collected at the
time.
I'll never
forget the feeling of awe I experienced leafing through "Pumping
Iron" in that department store all those years ago. But it
wasn't just over my discovery that people could actually look like
the men on those pages. What really made a lasting impression on
my 12-year-old mind was that maybe, just maybe, if I worked hard
enough, I could look like that one day too!
I like to
recount this story when I tell people how lucky I feel to have found
bodybuilding when I did. Because if I were twelve today and picked
up a copy of one of today's bodybuilding books or magazines I would
have put it back down and headed straight for the comics.
What appealed
to me so much then was the idealized version of manhood the athletes
in "Pumping Iron" represented Broad shoulders, narrow
waists, strong arms. Whether they actually embodied it or not, they
all depicted the image of health, vitality, strength and masculinity.
And, even more significantly at the time, bodybuilding appeared
to be an express ticket to manhood.
But the
competitors of today paint a different picture entirely. I will
not get into descriptives here because I want this site to remain
positive in tone. I will just say that the look favored my many
pro bodybuilders today is not, nor ever would have been, one that
I find appealing. This is not to say that the athletes don't work
every bit as hard as their forbears to achieve their condition.
But the results, in my mind, are not always worth the sacrifice.
So
I have created this website as a way of:
- Commemorating
some bodybuilders who competed between the mid-60's and the
mid-80's, my "Golden Age"
- Giving
people like me the chance to reminisce and,
- Giving
younger bodybuilders and non-bodybuilders a glance at a piece
of the sport's history
Of course
the period of time I've chosen to commemorate is not so much a "period"
as an arbitrary span of years picked by me. One might argue that
Steve Reeves began the Golden Age in the late 40's. Or John Grimek.
Or even that bodybuilding didn't really get going until Mentzer
hit the scene in the late 70's.
Well, I
can appreciate many points of view and they're all valid. But this
is my site.
I hope you
enjoy it.
-Shawn Perine
6/17/02
|